Question

W

p-value

Level of agreement

1: Are the aims clear?

0.56

<0.001*

Moderate

2: Does it achieve its aims?

.

.

N/A

3: Is it relevant?

0.54

0.001*

Moderate

4: Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)?

0.70

<0.001*

Substantial

5: Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced?

0.64

<0.001*

Substantial

6: Is it balanced and unbiased?

0.47

0.02*

Moderate

7: Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information?

0.70

<0.001*

Substantial

8: Does it refer to areas of uncertainty?

0.53

0.001*

Moderate

9: Does it describe how each treatment works?

0.58

<0.001*

Moderate

10: Does it describe the benefits of each treatment?

0.59

<0.001*

Moderate

11: Does it describe the risks of each treatment?

0.63

<0.001*

Substantial

12: Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used?

0.50

0.007*

Moderate

13: Does it describe how the treatment choices affect overall quality of life?

0.55

<0.001*

Moderate

14: Is it clear that there may be more than one possible treatment choice?

0.73

<0.001*

Substantial

15: Does it provide support for shared decision-making?

0.62

<0.001*

Substantial

16: Based on the answers to all of the above questions, rate the overall quality of the publication as a source of information about treatment choices

0.65

<0.001*

Substantial